Bean (2013-09-19 01:10:22)

---

The DRM, yeah, imagine if a relative broke your console and you had 100 games.


Microsoft, you disgust me.

This post has been edited one or more times, the last time was:
2013-09-19 01:10:48

---

CodyP2000 (2013-09-19 01:13:26)

---

AAAHAHAHA @MeMewtwo

This post has been edited one or more times, the last time was:
2013-09-19 04:43:08

---

pikarceus (2013-09-19 02:22:49)

---

@Nintendude-In games like BattleField, the PC experience is better, no ifs ands or buts about it. But in most games it's just better graphics that the average person wouldn't even notice.

Would it be nice to play Assassin's Creed III without seeing grass on the other side of lakes pop into thin air? Yes. Is it worth getting a $1,000 PC for.? Hell no.

I did forget to mention mods: Some people are REALLY into those. Player-created content has never really interested me though.

This post has been edited one or more times, the last time was:
2013-09-19 02:23:20

---

Screamer (2013-09-19 03:09:34)

---

The immaturity here is driving me nuts.

---

Bean (2013-09-19 07:41:52)

---

^ FACEPALM OF FURY!

---

Screamer (2013-09-19 12:20:01)

---

Your points are valid. @Jellso

---

Nin10dude789 (2013-09-19 19:56:01)

---

@Jellso
Again, PC is a TOOL, not a gaming console.

Console gaming is way much more popular than PC, better games, and more memorable games.

PC doesn't have Mario, Zelda, Uncharted, Little Big Planet, and a ton more games.

PC is a console wannabe.

This post has been edited one or more times, the last time was:
2013-09-19 19:58:17

---

Bean (2013-09-19 20:02:02)

---

^ Very true.

---

KVislost (2013-09-19 22:48:16)

---

ps4. The commercials for xbox one are bad and the ideas they had. like you NEED to play with online the whole time

---

pikarceus (2013-09-20 00:21:54)

---

@IronMadden-I have to disagree. We are looking at a very smooth transition compared to last gen. The leap to HD really hurt the industry initially, and it took until 2009 for devs to get a grasp of the new hardware. PS4 and One don't increase resolution (4k can't be used for games), also PS4 and One are roughly 8 times as powerful as 360/PS3, as opposed to the 360/PS3 being 20 times as powerful as PS2/Xbox.

Devs will have an easier time adapting this time around.

---

Nin10dude789 (2013-09-20 14:37:37)

---

Wii U and PS4 are true gaming consoles.

---

Bean (2013-09-20 19:04:18)

---

^ True...

---

Nin10dude789 (2013-09-20 20:50:29)

---

@Jellso
That proves that the XBox One is not a true gaming console.

---

CodyP2000 (2013-09-20 21:27:42)

---

2011. PSN got hacked in 2011. -therealslayed

---------------------------------------------------------

BTW, I'm going for PS4.

-Xbox consoles get banned for no reasons
-PSN's security is much better than Xbox Live's, IN MY OPINION. The PSN downage was basically the only time they got hacked.

Even if Xbox is better than the PlayStation in some ways, I went for the PS3 because, the failure rates for Xbox 360 in 2009 time occupied more then half the owners of Xbox.

This post has been edited one or more times, the last time was:
2013-09-20 21:47:35

---

CodyP2000 (2013-09-20 21:37:12)

---

PFFFT. You are literally too stupid to insult. Watch this



I freaking swear, you don't know anything about Xbox and its history, do you?

Also, go look at this page: http://www.joystiq.com/2009/08/17/game-informer-xbox-360-at-54-2-percent-failure-rate/

This article was created in 2009. In my previous comment I said that "in 2009 the failure rate for Xbox 360 occupied over half of the owners of Xbox."

Proves that you are stupid.

This post has been edited one or more times, the last time was:
2013-09-20 21:47:57

---